@Simonbethke ...man, you misunderstood something here - this is LOD3!!! The high quality version has 50MSplats and could never run over web :)
Honestly I find the price is more than fair for what it is, but of course everybody has to weight that on his own.
We already wrote about this. I think this result is mostly underwhelming. The quality is consistent but the level of detail is far from what I would expect at this pricepoint. On the good side is, that this fact keeps creating high quality splats a form of art - which I know you master too @schindelar (when putting away this toy-camera) :D
@epigraph Well this was really a worst case scenario for the portalcam. Lensflares due to direct sunlight, tourists passing by, slight wind, very samll and intricate details from the plants... I havn't been fair ;) But I mean that's what you do when hardcore testing. All in all I think the result is absolutely ok for what it is (and for the price!!)
The amount of detail is almost too harsh on the eyes. Impressive results! Biggest problem areas I see are the purple halos in the trees, but probably could resolve out with more surrounding coverage. Cool to see early results of the new PortalCam. Thank you for sharing.
Just curious here, are you able to generate even larger / more detailed splat scene from this data set? We (PlayCanvas team) are just working on a streaming tech for this, and so I wonder about possibilities here.